MapPoint Forums

MapForums

Community of VE/MapPoint Users and Developers




possible ways around the MP 2003 eula

This is a discussion on possible ways around the MP 2003 eula within the MapPoint 2006/2009 Discussion forums, part of the Map Forums category; I think most fleet management apps currently run with SMS in Europe and sometimes from data calls, latency times can ...


Go Back   MapPoint Forums > Map Forums > MapPoint 2006/2009 Discussion

Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Click here to register

Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2002
Senior Member
Black Belt
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,138
possible ways around the MP 2003 eula

I think most fleet management apps currently run with SMS in Europe and sometimes from data calls, latency times can often be up to 15 secs or more for SMS.
The agreement says that there must a 15 sec between the GPS fix and the data being made available to the user, NOT the application. Just introduce a flat 15sec delay on all GPS fixes and it is no longer a real time or near real time system and it is no longer a fleet management system either, therefore you are excempt from the EULA. I guess you actually have Fleet historical reporting application now.

to Quote
"Fleet Applications" shall mean software, products or systems capable, in real-time or near-real time, of any one or more of locating, monitoring, tracking, ...."
and
"Near real-time" takes into account network latency, transmission time and any other systems delays. For the purpose of the MapPoint 2003 EULA, we will interpret any application that has a guaranteed minimum of 15 seconds between acquisition of the location fix and the availability of this location fix to the user as a NON near real-time solution (and therefore not subject to Fleet Application licensing restrictions."


Therefore lets just guarantee a minimum delay of 16 seconds between actually GPS measurement and the availability of the data to the USER which is good enough for most applications and fleet managers I know.
If you are clever you could calculate the network latency for say a SMS message by sbtracting the very accurate GPS timestamp from another accurate timesource,(either from an accurate PC clock or perhaps the mobile network providers timestamp if delivered with a SMS message) that represents the time that the users application receives the data and only add the neccasery delay that is needed to bring you upto 16 seconds. In some instances this may actually be 0.
For example GPS reading taken at 13:00:00hrs , the SMS is received by the APPLICATION at 13:00:09hrs, now let the application add a 7sec delay and give the USER the results at 13:00:16hrs. For data calls just add a flat 16 delay to all co-ordinates.
I'll call this Dynamic Delay Timing, or DDT. Now do you think DDT could be harmfull to anyones harshly imposed restrictions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2003
Junior Member
White Belt
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1
More ideas for discussion

I was thinking the same thing.
To expand on your idea - if you have, say, three MapPoint licences, could you track/locate/monitor up to three vehicles in real-time and impose the 16s artificial delay on any others?
The reason I am interested in this idea is that in my application (which does use SMS by the way), a delay of up to a minute is usually acceptable, but from time to time I would like to reduce this delay to a minimum.

Also, what does 'user' mean in this sense? Is it a human being or any application program integrated with the MapPoint software? You might have to make sure your delay is imposed before it reaches this application.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2003, eula, ways


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EULA rbarthels MapPoint 2006/2009 Discussion 1 05-29-2006 10:17 AM
Mapppoint 2003 EULA vs "Fleet Applications" Anonymous MapPoint 2006/2009 Discussion 9 04-17-2004 03:03 PM
Where can I find the MapPoint 2003/2004 EULA? Anonymous MapPoint 2006/2009 Discussion 1 06-02-2003 02:54 PM
MapPoint 2003 EULA impose real-time vihecle guidance. Anonymous MapPoint 2006/2009 Discussion 4 09-18-2002 12:19 PM
mappoint 2003 new eula restrictions Anonymous MapPoint 2006/2009 Discussion 0 09-02-2002 03:33 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
MP2K Magazine
Visitor Map


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54